explored matters such because the ethics surrounding the use of generative artificial intelligence on issues of faith; the guarantees and perils of AI; the seek for relaxation and contemplation in an ever-evolving world; using AI within the power sector to construct resilience in opposition to local weather disaster; and many others.
The four-day convention drew 115 delegates from 18 international locations from a spectrum of fields reminiscent of pc science, robotics, genetics, astronomy, medication, philosophy, theology, sociology, legislation, psychology, and pastoral care of the church.
“Specialised audio system with completely different scientific and epistemological backgrounds, but in addition with varied social and philosophical perceptions, contributed to a fancy, however fruitful dialogue,” reads a communique from the convention. “The probabilities and achievements of artificial intelligence, the goals of the ideology of trans-humanism, the aspirations of trans-humanism, the deconstructionist righteousness of the tradition of awakening had been fields of intense reflection and dialogue.”
The convention was a problem and invitation for the anthropology and ethics of Orthodox theology, in addition to for branches of philosophy, particularly those who study the interrelationship of science and technology with human growth:
“The achievements of artificial intelligence in genetics, medication, the sector of utilized applied sciences, in addition to in on a regular basis life had been offered with references to the necessity to set up guidelines for correct use, with a view to keep away from adversarial penalties for people from its abuse or misuse,” reads the communique. “Prudent political and authorized regulation of AI coverage has emerged as an pressing want and specific reference has been made to initiatives throughout the European Union.”
The likelihood of nice social inequalities was highlighted as nicely.
“Doing enterprise on this sector specifically with no spirit of accountability can carry unexpected penalties and intractable issues,” notes the communique. “On the theological stage, the rapporteurs adequately and clearly set out the rules of Orthodox anthropology, defining man as a creation within the picture and likeness of God, as a psychosomatic entity with the chance of free self-determination in eternity.”