The Nobel Prize in Physics 2024. NobelPrize.org https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2024/press-release/.
The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2024. NobelPrize.org https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2024/press-release/.
Burdick, A. & Miller, Okay. A Shift in the World of Science. The New York Occasions (2024).
AI wins huge at the Nobels. The Economist.
Hopfield, J. J. Neural networks and bodily programs with emergent collective computational skills. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 79, 2554–2558 (1982).
Ackley, D. H., Hinton, G. E. & Sejnowski, T. J. A studying algorithm for boltzmann machines. Cogn. Sci. 9, 147–169 (1985).
Kriegeskorte, N. & Golan, T. Neural community fashions and deep studying. Curr. Biol. CB 29, R231–R236 (2019).
ChatGPT. https://openai.com/chatgpt/overview/.
Sarker, I. H. Machine studying: Algorithms, real-world functions and analysis instructions. SN Comput. Sci. 2, 160 (2021).
Fogel, A. L. & Kvedar, J. C. Artificial intelligence powers digital medicine. Npj Digit. Med. 1, 1–4 (2018).
Nerella, S. et al. Transformers and enormous language fashions in healthcare: A overview. Artif. Intell. Med. 154, 102900 (2024).
Rittenbach, D. AI will change our lives greater than the printing press or web. Medium https://magus523.medium.com/ai-will-change-our-lives-more-than-the-printing-press-or-internet-51e575041ddb (2022).
Dill, Okay. A. & MacCallum, J. L. The protein-folding drawback, 50 years on. Science 338, 1042–1046 (2012).
Bernstein, F. C. et al. The Protein Information Financial institution: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular buildings. J. Mol. Biol. 112, 535–542 (1977).
Jumper, J. et al. Extremely correct protein construction prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
Tunyasuvunakool, Okay. et al. Extremely correct protein construction prediction for the human proteome. Nature 596, 590–596 (2021).
Yang, Z., Zeng, X., Zhao, Y. & Chen, R. AlphaFold2 and its functions in the fields of biology and medicine. Sign Transduct. Goal. Ther. 8, 115 (2023).
About the Nobel Prize. NobelPrize.org https://www.nobelprize.org/about-the-nobel-prize/.
Google’s Nobel prize winners stir debate over AI analysis. CBC Information (2024).
Triantafyllidis, A. Okay. & Tsanas, A. Purposes of machine studying in real-life digital well being interventions: Evaluation of the literature. J. Med. Web Res. 21, e12286 (2019).
Verma, A. A. et al. Scientific analysis of a machine studying–primarily based early warning system for affected person deterioration. CMAJ 196, E1027–E1037 (2024).
Han, R. et al. Randomised managed trials evaluating synthetic intelligence in scientific apply: A scoping overview. Lancet Digit. Well being 6, e367–e373 (2024).
Callan, I. AI might ‘take management’ and ‘make us irrelevant’ because it advances, Nobel Prize winner warns. International Information https://globalnews.ca/news/10811125/artificial-intelligence-threat-geoffrey-hinton/.
Korn, J. AI pioneer quits Google to warn about the expertise’s ‘risks’ | CNN Enterprise. CNN https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/01/tech/geoffrey-hinton-leaves-google-ai-fears/index.html (2023).
The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1935. NobelPrize.org https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/1935/summary/.
Tirrell, M. With AI warning, Nobel winner joins ranks of laureates who’ve cautioned about the dangers of their very own work. CNN (2024).
Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings – ICAN. https://www.icanw.org/hiroshima_and_nagasaki_bombings.
The Nobel Peace Prize 2024. NobelPrize.org https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace/2024/summary/.
Leslie, D., Mazumder, A., Peppin, A., Wolters, M. Okay. & Hagerty, A. Does “AI” stand for augmenting inequality in the period of covid-19 healthcare? The BMJ 372, n304 (2021).
Brundage, M. et al. The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigation. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802.07228 (2018).
Creemers, R. China’s Social Credit score System: An Evolving Follow of Management. SSRN Scholarly Paper at https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3175792 (2018).
Javorsky, E., Tegmark, M. & Helfand, I. Deadly autonomous weapons. BMJ 364, l1171 (2019).
Challen, R. et al. Artificial intelligence, bias and scientific security. BMJ Qual. Saf. 28, 231–237 (2019).
Čartolovni, A., Malešević, A. & Poslon, L. Vital evaluation of the AI affect on the affected person–doctor relationship: A multi-stakeholder qualitative examine. Digit. Well being 9, 20552076231220833 (2023).
Murdoch, B. Privateness and synthetic intelligence: challenges for defending well being data in a brand new period. BMC Med. Ethics 22, 122 (2021).
Mitchell, M. Debates on the nature of synthetic common intelligence. Science 383, eado7069 (2024).
Federspiel, F., Mitchell, R., Asokan, A., Umana, C. & McCoy, D. Threats by synthetic intelligence to human well being and human existence. BMJ Glob. Well being 8, e010435 (2023).
Assertion on AI Threat | CAIS. https://www.safe.ai/work/statement-on-ai-risk.
Ambartsoumean, V. M. & Yampolskiy, R. V. AI threat skepticism, a complete survey. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.03885 (2023).
Lazar, S. & Nelson, A. AI security on whose phrases? Science 381, 138 (2023).
Qian, N. & Sejnowski, T. J. Predicting the secondary construction of globular proteins utilizing neural community fashions. J. Mol. Biol. 202, 865–884 (1988).
Bohr, H. et al. Protein secondary construction and homology by neural networks. The alpha-helices in rhodopsin. FEBS Lett. 241, 223–228 (1988).
Google DeepMind. Google DeepMind https://deepmind.google/ (2024).
Senior, A. W. et al. Improved protein construction prediction utilizing potentials from deep studying. Nature 577, 706–710 (2020).